The providences that host most crypto-mining facilities correlate with providences that produce their energy from renewable resources. In 2017, 80% of China’s Bitcoin mining operations were based in Sichuan – a province that generates approximately 90% of its energy production from renewable resources, thereby accounting for 43% of global Bitcoin mining operations.
Explained : The Environmental Impact of Cryptocurrency Mining
New Delhi (ABC Live India): In the era of economic
slowdown due to COVDI-19 pandemic, the craze for cryptocurrencies is increasing
in India among young investors but the absence of statutory provisions for its
regulations in India always raises the concern for the security of investment made by retail investors in cryptocurrencies.
ABC Research Team working on “Cryptocurrencies
and its Future” while doing research has referred to research for all those
who are interested to invest money in the cryptocurrencies market.
The research titled “The
Political Geography and Environmental Impacts of Cryptocurrency Mining”
authored by Heidi Samford and
Lovely-Frances Doming of Washington based Henry M. Jackson School of
International Studies.
The Research
says, “Since Bitcoin’s founding in 2009, thousands of Bitcoins have entered
circulation. A popular conception of the “virtual” nature of cryptocurrency
dominates, but cryptocurrency is deeply embedded in policy and physical
environments. And, while most analysis of the phenomenon focuses on the
disruptive impact of cryptocurrency on financial markets, cryptocurrency also
negatively impacts the communities and the environment.”
Further study confirmed that “To maximize
profits, cryptocurrency miners seek low-cost electricity and permissive policy
environments, creating environmental hazards and impacting local consumers without
producing any benefit for communities. Cryptocurrency “miners” produce currency
through energy-intensive “mining” processes, requiring extensive computing
resources.
A website namely Cointelegraph
dedicatedly reporting blockchain
technology, crypto assets, and emerging fintech trends on May 17, 2018
reported that “Economist Alex de Vries, who published an article on
“Bitcoin’s Growing Energy Problem,” yesterday, May 16, in a scientific journal
Joule told the Independent that Bitcoin (BTC) mining will use 0.5 percent of
the world’s energy by 2018.”
Also, The Cell Press, A scientific journal
reported that the Bitcoin network
consumes at least 2.55 GW of electricity currently, and that it could reach a
consumption of 7.67 GW in the future, making it comparable with countries such
as Ireland (3.1 GW) and Austria (8.2 GW).
The Environmental Impact of Cryptocurrency
Mining
The
Report confirmed
that the public narrative surrounding
Bitcoin’s impact on the environment has been predominately negative, with
conflicting accounts debating the level of cryptocurrencies’ footprint. Indeed,
anywhere that cryptocurrency mining is dependent on dirty energy sources, such
as coal, the environmental impacts are markedly negative, such as near the
coal-fueled cryptocurrency mines in Mongolia. However, most crypto-mining occurs
in areas with renewable energy sources because costs are lower.
Depending
on the energy source, researchers estimate that crypto-mining can produce 3-15
million tons of global carbon emissions.
China is one of the world’s largest producers, and consumers, of
coal energy with mines in the Xinjiang and Inner Mongolian provinces heavily
reliant on coal energy sources to provide crypto-mining companies with cheap
energy prices. Coal energy sources offer prices up to 30% cheaper than the
average energy consumption prices for industrial firms. However, when compared to the amount generated by renewable energy sources in Canada, any cryptocurrency
mined in China would generate four times the amount of CO2 emissions.
Recent figures indicate crypto-mining facilities may subsidize the development of renewable energy resources by seeking the cheapest resource, optimizing consumption value. Bitcoin mining operations in China illustrate the relationship between renewable energy and crypto-mining. The providences that host most crypto-mining facilities correlate with providences that produce their energy from renewable resources.
In 2017, 80% of China’s Bitcoin mining
operations were based in Sichuan – a province that generates approximately 90%
of its energy production from renewable resources, thereby accounting for 43%
of global Bitcoin mining operations.
A report by CoinShares Research estimates that approximately
77.6% of crypto-mining facilities are consuming electricity derived from
renewable resources, while the other 22.4% are obtained from fossil and nuclear
producers.
Additionally, large-scale mines in other popular locations are
primarily located in the Pacific Northwest, Upstate New York, Northern
Scandinavia, Iceland, and Georgia – regions that extensively use renewable
energy.
The
profitability of cryptocurrency mining is dependent on the currency’s market
value in concurrence with the price of electricity. If the value of a
cryptocurrency depreciates below its cost of production, mining becomes
unprofitable due to large energy expenditure.
The most prosperous crypto-mines are facilities that can operate
at the lowest cost by obtaining the cheapest electricity capable of supporting
extreme consumption, supporting enormous cryptocurrency mining farms across the world with easy access to cheap energy, or access to surplus energy stores.
As a result, miners seek cheap electricity markets while
benefiting from policy environments that do not regulate the ways in which
electricity can be consumed.