Ultimately, the question of whether a presidential form of government suits India is subjective and depends on various factors, including the political culture, historical context, and the preferences of the citizens.

New Delhi (ABC Live): The suitability of a presidential form of government for India is a complex and debated topic. India operates under a parliamentary system of government. However, it's worth considering some arguments both for and against the adoption of a presidential system in the Indian context:

Arguments in Favor of a Presidential System:

Stability and Continuity: Proponents argue that a presidential system could provide more stability and continuity in governance. The fixed term of the president could avoid frequent leadership changes that sometimes occur in parliamentary systems.

Clear Separation of Powers: A presidential system typically involves a clearer separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. Advocates suggest that this separation can prevent conflicts of interest and enhance checks and balances.

Direct Election of the Head of State: In a presidential system, the head of state (president) is directly elected by the people. Some argue that this direct mandate could enhance the president's legitimacy and independence from the legislature.

Arguments Against a Presidential System:

Potential for Gridlock: Critics argue that a presidential system may lead to gridlock and difficulties in passing legislation. The separation of powers could result in conflicts between the executive and legislative branches, hindering effective governance.

Risk of Authoritarianism: Concerns exist that a strong presidency might concentrate too much power in the hands of one individual, potentially leading to authoritarian tendencies. A parliamentary system, with collective responsibility, may distribute power more evenly.

Cultural and Diversity Challenges: India's cultural and linguistic diversity could pose challenges for a presidential system. In a parliamentary system, diverse groups can be accommodated through coalition governments, fostering a sense of inclusivity.

Adaptation to Local Realities: India's federal structure with a strong role for states might find better accommodation in a parliamentary system, which allows for representation and collaboration between the center and the states.

Experience and Tradition: India has a long history of parliamentary democracy, and there is an argument that shifting to a presidential system might require a significant departure from existing political practices and traditions.

Ultimately, the question of whether a presidential form of government suits India is subjective and depends on various factors, including the political culture, historical context, and the preferences of the citizens. Any consideration of such a change would likely involve careful constitutional amendments and a broad national dialogue to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks.